IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION

Review Petition (Civil) No of 2023 (D No 34047 of 2023) in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No 8325 of 2023

S Venkatesh

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

Union of India and Anr

...Respondent(s)

ORDER

• $\mathbf{1}$ Application for listing the review petition in open Court is rejected.
• Delay condoned. $\mathsf{2}$
• $\overline{3}$ Having perused the review petition, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 has been established. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed.

...................................... [Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud]

....................................... [Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha]

....................................... [Manoj Misra]

🕷 Delhi; September 19, 2024 $-S-$

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 34047/2023 in SLP(C) No. 8325/2023

S. VENKATESH Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s)

(WITH IA No. 191757/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION, IA No. 166107/2023 - ORAL HEARING, IA No. 166108/2023 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON)

Date : 19-09-2024 This petition was circulated today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA

By Circulation

UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R

• 1 Application for listing the review petition in open Court is rejected.
• 2 Delay condoned.
• 3 The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
• 4 Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed order is placed on the file)