Gram Panchayat Taraf Behbal Bahadar vs. State Of Punjab

Item NO.4 1

REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1059/2011

GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.UDAIPUR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and setting aside an abatement and substitution of deceased respondent and office report)

WITH SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 Interim Relief and Office Report)

Date : 19/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)	Ms. Tanuj Bhagga Sharma,Adv.<br>Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv.
	Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv.
	Ms. Divya Sunderrajan,Adv.<br>Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv.
	Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv.<br>Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv.
For Respondent(s)	Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.<br>Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv.

Mr. N.K. Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr. Piyush Hans,Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Jai Wadhwa,Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj,Adv. Mr. Vishwapal Singh,Adv. Mr. Hemant Gupta,Adv. Mr. Keshav Kumar,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 1059/2011

Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents.

SLP(C) No. 34114/2011

The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Respondent Nos. 3 to 8 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.

SLP(C) No. 6505/2012

Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 have already filed the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

SLP(C) No. 8111/2013

Respondent No. 4 has already filed the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 1, 2 , 5 and 6 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

The Ld.Counsel for the respondent No.3 has failed to cure the defects found in the vakalatnama despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

MG