Linga Vijayan (Dead) vs. Ramachandra Marthandam

Ð Item No.96 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 10190/2010 LINGA VIJAYAN & ORS. Appellant(s ) VERSUS RAMACHANDRA MARTHANDAM Respondent( s) Date : 28/04/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Sripradha Krishnan,Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the appellants and the Ld. Counsel for the respondent have failed to file the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by letter dated 1.11.2011 of the Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Madhu Grover leave to appeal (SLP)/Appeal, as statement of case,and does not Date: 2015.04.29 13:04:57 CEST Reason: desire to file any further statement of case. The order fu rther provides that if the respondent who has entered appearance does not Item No.96 2 file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. Therefore, in view of the rule position cited above the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar