Mridul vs. State Of Haryana
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
8 Dec 2016
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION
CURATIVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.89 OF 2016 IN REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NO.43 OF 2016 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.6375 OF 2015
MRIDUL ... Petitioner(s)
VS.
STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent(s)
O R D E R
Having gone through the Curative Petition and the relevant documents, in our considered opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs. Ashok Hurra & Anr., reported in 2002 (4) SCC 388.
The Curative Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
.....................................CJI. [JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR]
........................................J. [DIPAK MISRA]
........................................J. [J. CHELAMESWAR]
........................................J. [PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE]
........................................J. [R.K. AGRAWAL]
New Delhi; 18th January, 2017. S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CURATIVE PETITION (CRL.)NO.89/2016 In RREVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NO.43/2016 IN SLP(CRL.)NO.6375/2015
MRIDUL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(s) (With office report)
Date : 18/01/2017 This petition was circulated today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL
By Circulation
UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R
The curative petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
(Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana) Court Master Assistant Registrar
(Signed order is placed on the file)