Mahanagar Telecom Nigam Ltd vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India

\204ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NOS.271-281 OF 2011 (For Prel. Hearing) TELECOM REGULATORY AUTH.OF INDIA Appellant (s) VERSUS B.S.N.L. ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay and office report)

Date: 04/02/2011 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR

For Appellant(s) Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,AG. Mr. Sanjay Kapur,Adv. Ms. Ashmi Mohan,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Nanda,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Singh,Adv. For Idea Cellular: Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv.

For Cellular Operators Mr. C.A. Sundaram,Sr.Adv. Association of India: Mr. Gopal Jain,Sr.Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. Mr. Tushar Singh,Adv.

For Bharti Airtel Ltd: Mr. Gopal Jain,Sr.Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. Mr. Tushar Singh,Adv.

• 2 -

....2/-

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Admit.

As far as interim relief is concerned, time is given to the appellant to implement the decision of TDSAT within a further period of four months from today without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties.

[ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar