Mahanagar Telecom Nigam Ltd vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India

2=PART-HEARD ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTIONS XVII XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO.5253 OF 2010 B.S.N.L. Appellant (s) VERSUS TELECOM REGULATORY AUTH.OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and office report) [For Final Disposal] With Civil Appeal No.5184 of 2010 (With appln.(s) for stay and impleadment) [For Final Disposal] Civil Appeal No.5873 of 2010 (With appln.(s) for stay and office report) [For Final Disposal] Civil Appeal No.6068 of 2010 (With appln.(s) for stay, permission to file additional documents and office report) [For Final Disposal] Civil Appeal No.6255 of 2010 (With appln.(s) for stay and office report) [For Final Disposal] Civil Appeal Nos.951-952 of 2005 (With office report) Civil Appeal No.3298 of 2005 (With appln.(s) for permission to place additional documents on record and office report

Civil Appeal No.3299 of 2005 (With office report)

Civil Appeal No.4529 of 2005 (With office report)

Civil Appeal No.6049 of 2005 (With appln.(s) for interim directions, stay and ex-parte stay) ...2/-

• 2 -

Civil Appeal No.802 of 2006 (With office report)

Civil Appeal No.2731 of 2006 (With office report)

Civil Appeal No.2794 of 2006

Civil Appeal No.3504 of 2006 (With office report)

Civil Appeal Nos.5834-5836 of 2005 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and office report)

Civil Appeal No.5837 of 2005

(With office report) Civil Appeal Nos.4965-4966 of 2007 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and stay) Civil Appeal No.177 of 2008 (With appln.(s) for stay, permission to place additional documents on record and office report) Civil Appeal Nos.598-599 of 2008 (With office report) Civil Appeal No..........D28298/2010 (With appln.(s) for permission to file appeal and office report) Transfer Petition (C) No.1111 of 2010 (With office report) Date: 09/12/2010 These Matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR For Appellant(s) Mr. Maninder Singh,Sr.Adv. Ms. Pratibha M. Singh,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Mukerji,Adv. ...3/- - 3 - Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Manjul Bajpai,Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal,Adv. Ms. Bina Gupta,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Singh,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Wahi,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi,Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kapur,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar,Adv. Ms. Shubhra Kapur,Adv. Mr. Ramji Srinivasan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal,Adv. Ms. Sikha Sharma,Adv. Mr. Zeyul Haque,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Ramji Srinivasan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Zeyul Haque,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Mehta,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,AG. Mr. Sanjay Kapur,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Kapur,Adv. Ms. Ashmi Mohan,Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. Mr. Vinobha Bhoopathy,Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia,Adv. Mr. Thakur,Adv. Mr. Ayushya Kumar,Adv.

Ms. Madhu Sikri,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi,Sr.Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kapur,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar,Adv. Ms. Shubhra Kapur,Adv. Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,AG. Mr. Sanjay Kapur,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Kapur,Adv. Ms. Ashmi Mohan,Adv. ...4/- - 4 - Mr. Maninder Singh,Sr.Adv. Ms. Pratibha M. Singh,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Mukerji,Adv. Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Manjul Bajpai,Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal,Adv. Ms. Bina Gupta,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Singh,Adv. Ms. Pallavi Wahi,Adv. Mr. Ramji Srinivasan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal,Adv. Ms. Sikha Sharma,Adv. Mr. Zeyul Haque,Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Navin Chawla,Adv. Mr. Vinobha Bhoopathy,Adv. Mr. S.W.A. Qadri,Adv. Ms. Saima Bakshi,Adv. Mr. Minnatullah,Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma,Adv. Mr. Arun Kathpalia,Adv. Mr. Thakur,Adv. Mr. Ayushya Kumar,Adv. Ms. Madhu Sikri,Adv. Ms. Rakhi Ray,Adv. Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv. Mr. Manu Nair,Adv. for M/s. Suresh A. Shroff & Co.,Advs. Ms. Rachana Joshi Issar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In Civil Appeals: Place these appeals on 14th December, 2010. ....5/- - 5 - In T.P. (C) No.1111 of 2010: Heard learned counsel.

The transfer petition is allowed in terms

of signed order. The Registry is directed to immediately take necessary steps. Dasti granted. Place the case on 14th December, 2010. [ T.I. Rajput ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar [Signed order is placed on the file] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION [C] NO.1111 OF 2010 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India ...Petitioner(s) Versus Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal & Anr. ...Respondent(s) O R D E R Heard learned counsel. The transfer petition is allowed in terms of prayer (a), which is re-produced below: "this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct that the Letters Patent Appeal No.337 of 2006 titled Telecom Regulatory Authority of India vs. Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal & Anr., pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi be transferred to this Hon'ble Court for disposal of the same." The Registry is directed to immediately take necessary steps. Place the case on 14th December, 2010. .........................CJI. [S.H. KAPADIA] ...........................J. [K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN] ...........................J. [SWATANTER KUMAR] New Delhi, December 09, 2010.