Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Shandong Teijun Electric Power Engineering Company Limited

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Indira Banerjee, Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:17 Aug 2020
CNR:SCIN010265442019

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Ordinary

Before:

Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy

Stage:

DIRECTION MATTERS

Remarks:

Dismissed [appln for withdrawal is allowed subject to payment of ct.fee]

Listed On:

17 Aug 2020

In:

Chamber

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

50265/2020,50267/2020,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

Court 8 (Video Conferencing) ITEM NO.6

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition for Arbitration (Civil) No.33/2019

LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SHANDONG TEIJUN ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED

IA No. 50267/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT IA No. 50265/2020 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION)

Date: 17-08-2020 These matters were called on for hearing today.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY CORAM : [IN CHAMBERS]

  • For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. B. Ramana Murthy, AOR
  • For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhinav Raghuvanshi, Adv. Ms. Anannya Ghosh, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, learned counsel refers to the memorandum of settlement dated 20.03.2020, executed between M/s. Larsen & Toubro Limited (first party) and M/s. Shandong Teijun Electric Engineering Company Limited (second Power party). Following the said mutual settlement, the petitioner has applied for withdrawal of the Arbitration Petition pending in this Court.

In the Office Report dated 25.06.2020, the Registry has Not Verified $\overline{\mathbf{R}}$ defective as requisite Fee has not been deposited. Court Responding to this, Mr. Shrivastava, learned counsel submits that the defects will be cured

Respondent $(s)$

immediately and subject to this, withdrawal application should be allowed in terms of settlement.

Mr. Abhinav Raghuvanshi, learned counsel is appearing for the respondent and he too submits that under the settlement dated 20.03.2020, parties have resolved their dispute.

In view of above, subject to deposit of the Court Fee, the withdrawal application stands allowed. Consequently, the Arbitration Petition No.33/2019 stands closed, in terms of mutual settlement.

(RACHNA) (DIPTI KHURANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(6) - 17 Aug 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(5) - 31 Jan 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 25 Nov 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 22 Oct 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 23 Sept 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 3 Sept 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view