Surinder Kaur (D) Tr. Lr vs. Bahadur Singh(D) Tr. Lrs

¾ ITEM NO.90 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 7424-7425/2011 SURINDER KAUR (D) TR.LR. Appellant(s ) VERSUS BAHADUR SINGH(D) TR.LRS.& ORS. Respondent( s) Date : 11/12/2014 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Ajay Kumar Talesara,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mrs.Manisha Bhandari,adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is that Ld.counsel for the appellant and the Ld.counsel for the appearing respondents have failed to file the statement of case, although they were notified to do so by notice dated 1.09.2012 of this Registry. The respondent Nos.5-9 have been deleted from the array of parties by order dated 22.10.2010 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant d oes not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special Signature Not Verified leave Digitally signed by to appeal(SLP)/appeal, as statement of case,and d oes not Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2014.12.12 desire to file any further 16:49:10 IST Reason: statement of case. The order further provides that if the respondent has entered appearance a nd does ......... .2 ITEM NO.90 -2not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

SB