The Central Bureau Of Investigation vs. Prakashan C

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRLMP.NO. 17403/2015 IN PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO(S). 6854/2015 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 18/12/2014 IN CRLA NO. 1084/2014 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM) THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION PETITIONER(S) VERSUS PRAKASHAN C & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) (FOR VACATING STAY AND OFFICE REPORT) Date : 23/11/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For parties : Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG Ms. Madhurima Mridul, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, Adv. Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, Sr. Adv. Mr. G. Prakash, Adv. Mr. Jishnu M.L., Adv. Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Babu M. R., Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A perusal of the office report dated 19th November, 2015 indicates that service on respondents Nos.2 and 3 is not complete. Liberty is granted to the learned counsel Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Vinod Lakhina Date: 2015.11.24 for the petitioner, to effect service on unserved 16:35:05 IST Reason:

Page No.1 of 2 respondent Nos. 2 and 3 through the Standing Counsel for the State of Kerala nominated for this Court.

Learned counsel for the contesting respondent No.1 states, that it is not necessary to file any formal counter affidavit to the instant Special Leave Petition, on account

\216 ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIB

of the fact that all necessary facts have already been placed on the record of this case through Crl.M.P. No.17403 of 2015 in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.6854 of 2015.

In view of the above, pleadings in the instant matter will be deemed to be complete, as respondents Nos. 2 and 3 are only proforma respondents.

List the matter for final disposal on 2nd December, 2015.

COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

[VINOD LAKHINA] [RENUKA SADANA]

Page No.2 of 2