M. P. College Bachao Sangharsh Samiti vs. S. Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee

$ ITEM NO.149 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 11406/2011 M.P.COLLEGE BACHAO SANGHARSH SAMITI &ORS Appellant(s ) VERSUS S.GURUDWARA PRABANDHAK COMMITTEE & ORS. Respondent( s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 13/03/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Niraj Gupta,Adv. Mr.Kuber Boddh,adv. Mr.Kartikey,adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr.Satinder S.Gulati,adv. Mrs. Kamaldeep Gulati,Adv. Mr.Rajesh K.Singh,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report is that Ld.counsel for the appellants and the Ld.counsel for the respondents have failed to fi le the statement of case, although they have been notified to do so by letter dated 04.12.2012 of this Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at Signature Not Verified the time of presentation of petition Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2015.03.14 for seeking special leave 12:52:49 IST Reason: to appeal(SLP)/appeal, as statement of case,and does not desire to ...

......2 ITEM NO.149 -2-

file any further statement of case. The order further provides that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same.

In view of the rule position cited above, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

SB