Government Of Nct Of Delhi Through Secretary vs. Harmesh Sandhu
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
28 May 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
&1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 777 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 2261 OF 2017 ] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) ⬠¦...CC NO. 1487 OF 2017 ] LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR (SOUTH) AND ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S HARMONY PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 778 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 2262 OF 2017 ] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) ⬠¦...CC NO. 1550 OF 2017 ] WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 779 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 2263 OF 2017 ] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) ⬠¦...CC NO. 1558 OF 2017 ] J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. The learned counsel for the appellants has brought to our notice that the appeals filed by the Delhi Development Authority have already been dismissed, however, with liberty to initiate fresh acquisition proceedings within a period of one year under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. 2 4. Subject to the liberty, as above, these appeals are also dismissed. 5. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. No costs. .......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] .......................J. [ A.M.KHANWILKAR ] New Delhi; January 20, 2017. 3 ITEM NO.36 + 58 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 1222/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/04/2016 in WPC No. 9548/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS NEERAJ JAIN AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) With SLP (C).....CC No. 1482 of 2017 (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) SLP (C).....CC No. 1487 of 2017 (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP (C).....CC No. 1527 of 2017 (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and office report) SLP (C).....CC No. 1550 of 2017 (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP (C).....CC No. 1558 of 2017
(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP (C).....CC No. 1659 of 2017 (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 20/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Bhatia, Adv. Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Monika, Adv. Mr. Sukrit R. Kapoor, Adv. 4 Ms. Garima Prasad, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C)......CC No. 1222 of 2017 Delay condoned. It is submitted that this is a case of subsequent purchaser. In view of the above, issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) No. 20511 of 2008. SLP (C).....CC No. 1482 of 2017 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of certain errors in the Judgment with regard to description of property, she seeks leave to withdraw this Special Leave Petition with liberty to file Review Petition before the High Court. Permission is granted with the above liberty. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that in case the Review Petition is filed within thirty days from today before the High Court, the same may not be dismissed on the ground of delay. SLP (C).....CC No. 1487 of 2017, SLP (C).....CC No. 1550 of 2017, SLP (C).....CC No. 1558 of 2017 Delay condoned. Leave granted. The appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. 5 SLP (C).....CC No. 1527 of 2017 Delay condoned. It is submitted that this is a case of subsequent purchaser. In view of the above, issue notice. SLP (C).....CC No. 1659 of 2017 Delay condoned. It is submitted that the possession could not be taken on account of operation of stay. In view of the above, issue notice. (Jayant Kumar Arora) Court Master (Renu Diwan) Assistant Registrar (Signed non-reportable Judgment is placed on the file)