Arindam Chaudhuri vs. Tata Motors Limited

$SLP(Crl.)$ No. 90/2016

COURT NO.3 ITEM NO.9

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).90/2016

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/02/2015 in CRLRP No.16/2008 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)

ARINDAM CHAUDHURI AND ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

M/S. TATA MOTORS AND ORS.

Respondent(s)

(With interim relief and office report)

Date: 13/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

$CORAM :$

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN

For Petitioner(s) Mr.Arunabh Chowdhury, Adv. Mr.Vaibhav Tomar, Adv. Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr.Sidharth Luthra, Sr.Adv. Mr.R.N.Karanjawala, Adv. Mr.Sandeep Kapur, Adv. Mr. Vivek Suri, Adv. Mr.Ravi Sharma, Adv. Ms.Apoorva Pandey, Adv. Mrs.Manik Karanjawala, Adv. For M/s. Karanjawala & Co., Adv.

Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Issue notice.

Mrs.Manik Karanjawala, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1.

Signature Not Verified Liberty is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners to serve respondent No.2 through the standing counsel representing the NCT of Delhi in this Court.

$\mathbf{1}$

Learned counsel for the rival parties are agreed that for disposal of the present controversy, it is not necessary to effect service on respondent Nos.3 and 4, as the same are only proforma respondents. Service on respondent Nos.3 and 4 is accordingly dispensed with.

Liberty is granted to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to file their counter affidavits within two weeks from today.

List thereafter.

Further proceedings shall remain stayed till further orders.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER