Rehana vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Abhay S. Oka, Hon'ble Sanjay Karol
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Disposed off
Listed On:
8 Apr 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
43564/2017,43566/2017,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.49
COURT NO.11
SECTION II
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4391/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-05-2017 in CRMWP No. 6990/2017 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)
REHANA
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(IA No. 43564/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ; IA No. 43566/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
WITH
SLP(Crl) No. 4400/2017 (II-B)
(IA NO. 43704/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date: 04-08-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, AOR
Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, AOR
- Ms. Shehla Chaudhary, Adv.
- Mr. Md. Anas Chaudhary, Adv.
- Mr. Jazib Siddiqui, Adv.
- Mr. Mohd. Anas Khan, Adv.
- Mr. Mohammad Asim Khan, Adv.
| For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR<br>Mr. K.N. Mishra, Adv.<br>Mr. Sunil Kumar Tomar, Adv.<br>Mr. Prabhat Kumar Rai, Adv. | |
|---|---|
| gnature Not Verified<br>igitally signed by<br>du Marwab<br>ate: 20 <del>23.</del> 08.07<br>$\frac{1}{47.59}$ | Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, AOR<br>Mr. Krishnam Mishra, Adv.<br>Mr. Param Kumar Mishra, Adv. |
Mr. Shankar Divate, AOR
Mr. L B Rai, Adv. Mr. Kartik Rai, Adv. Mr. Arun Upadhyay, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
By the impugned order, pre-arrest bail was granted which was operative only till the submission of the charge-sheet. Now, the charge-sheet has already been filed on 13.08.2017. Hence, the impugned order has worked itself out. Hence, no case for interference is made out.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a grievance that respondent nos.3 to 5 are not appearing before the Trial Court. If that be so, it will be for the Trial Court to take appropriate steps.
The Special Leave Petitions disposed of accordingly.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(INDU MARWAH) (AVGV RAMU)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)