Deepak Upadhyay vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble S. Ravindra Bhat, Hon'ble Aravind Kumar
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
24 Jul 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
93030/2023,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.8 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5848/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-02-2023 in A482 No. 15394/2021 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)
MOHIT UPADHYAY & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.93757/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )
WITH SLP(Crl) No. 5795/2023 (II) (FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 93030/2023 IA No. 93030/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Diary No(s). 15080/2023 (II) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.125350/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.125348/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS) Diary No(s). 15015/2023 (II) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.127461/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.127460/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS) SLP(Crl) No. 8655/2023 (II) ( IA No.135885/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
Date : 24-07-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. A D N Rao, Sr. Adv. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Annam Venkatesh, AOR | |
| Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv. | |
| Mr. Dhuli Shiva Shankar, Adv. | |
| Ms. Agrimaa Singh, Adv. | |
| Ms. Ritumbhara Garg, Adv. |
For Respondent(s)
Reason:
In SLP(Crl.) Nos. 5848 and 5795 of 2023 and Diary Nos. 15080 and 15015 of 2023
Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners.
This Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders.
The special leave petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
In SLP(Crl.) No. 8655 of 2023
Additionally, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners argued that the anticipatory bail application was rejected only on the ground that the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. was dismissed.
The argument is incorrect because plain reading of Paras 12-13 reveal that the Court took into consideration all circumstances as well as the fact that petition under Section 482 was dismissed.
In these circumstances, that ground too is not available. This special leave petition is also dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(POOJA SHARMA) (BEENA JOLLY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
2