Manish Kumar vs. Union Of India And Ors. Ministry Of Law And Justice Secretary

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 183 OF 2013 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURA

MANISH KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s) Date: 04/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-In-Person,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Santosh Kumar,adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi ,Adv Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran ,Adv Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat ,Adv Ms.Shubhra,adv. Mr. Gopal Singh ,Adv. Mr.Lagnesh Mishra,adv. Mr. V.N. Raghupathy ,Adv Mr. Mishra Saurabh ,Adv Mr. Om Prakash,adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra ,Adv Mr.Rudreshwar Singh,adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan ,Adv Ms.Vartika Sahay Walia,adv. M/S Corporate Law Group ,Adv Mr. Milind Kumar ,Adv. Mr.Saakaar Sardana,adv. Mr. Anip Sachthey ,Adv Mr.K.V. Jagdishvaran,adv. Ms. G. Indira ,Adv Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv. Mr.Anil Shrivastav,adv. Mr.Rituraj Biswas,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R .......2 ITEM NO.14 -2- Petitioner is present in person. The Ld.counsel for the respondent Nos.21, 30,32, 33 & the State of Karnataka are present. Ld.counsel for the State of Karnataka seeks and is granted four weeks time as last chance for filing the counter affidavit. What gets revealed from the perusal of the

office report is that the service of notice is incomplete on the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 6,11, 12, 27, 28, 34 and 36. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to them. He shall do the needful within a period of two weeks, failing which appropriate orders shall follow on the next date. Dasti in addition is

permitted to be served. List again on 30.07.2014.

(M.K.HANJURA) Registrar