Nalam Rakesh vs. Sri Chekuri Keerthi

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble R Raghunandan Rao
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:5 Sept 2023
CNR:APHC010383382022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

For Admission (Cc Matters)

Before:

Hon'ble R Raghunandan Rao

Listed On:

5 Sept 2023

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE राष्ट्र :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2494 OF 2022

Between:

Nalam Rakesh, S/o Uma Maheswara Rao, aged about 38 years, R/o D.No. 5-21-56, 2/10, Bordipet, Guntur, Guntur District.

AND

...Petitioner-

370%

Sri Chekuri Keerthi, D/o not known, aged not known, The Guntur Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Guntur, Guntur District.

St.

Griff. P

...Respondent

WHEREAS the Petitioner has presented under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of courts Act 1971, above case through his Counsel SMT MARELLA RADHA, praying that this Honble High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein for their violating of the orders in W.P.No.17240 of 2022, dated 28.06.2022;

WHEREAS the said case coming on for hearing on this day and whereas the High Court upon perusing the affidavit field herein and the order of High Court dated.07.09.2022, made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SMT MARELLA RADHA, Advocate for the Petitioner and of SRI MANOHAR REDDY MALLASANI Advocate for the Respondent, made the following

ORDER:

The petitioner had approached this Court with the complaint that the land of the petitioner situated in Sy.No.673/3 was being encroached by the respondent-authorities, who were seeking to construct a park in the land of the petitioner. $517.5 -$

This Court by an order dated 28.06.2022 had directed the respondents not to undertake any constructions in the land being claimed by the petitioner.

In the present Contempt Case, the petitioner contends that his land in Sy.No.673/3 was encroached upon by the respondent-authorities, who constructed a park in the lands of the petitioner despite knowledge of the orders of this Court. ~ $\sim 184^{\circ}$

In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents. It is stated that a survey was conducted by the town surveyor and the town surveyor has certified that the park was built in the land of the Corporation in Sy.No.673/2. A report of the surveyor has also been placed before this Court. This report

$\frac{2m}{m} = 1$ $\mathcal{L} = { \mathcal{L}, \mathcal{M} }$ $\mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{D}$ mit pri $\cdots \otimes \mathbb{R}$ $\mathbb{R}^{2n+1}{\text{out}}\cap\mathbb{R}^{2n+1}{\text{out}}$

shows that the land of the petitioner available in Sy.No.673/2 has also been identified. $\mathcal{H}_{\mathcal{M},\mathcal{I},\mathcal{O}^{\mathcal{A}}}$

$\mathcal{M}^{\text{max}}_{\text{max}}$ $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \mathcal{L}$ $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}$

$\mathcal{F} \rightarrow \mathcal{F}$

In the circumstances, it would be appropriate to direct the respondents to identify and show the land of the petitioners to the petitioner. It would be open for the petitioner or his representative to be present on 11.09.2023 at 10.30 a.m. On that day, the respondents or their representatives along with the surveyor shall identify the land of the petitioner in Sy.No.673/2.

Post on 05.10.2023 $\angle$

Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

    1. Sri Chekuri Keerthi, Commissioner, The Guntur Municipal Corporation, Guntur, Guntur District. (by RPAD)
    1. One CC to SRI. MARELLA RADHA Advocate [OPUC]

$\cdot \cdot \cdot$

$\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}}$

$\mathcal{A}^{\mathcal{A}}{\mathcal{A}}$ $\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{A}}$ $\mathcal{M} \neq \mathcal{M}$ $\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{M}\mathcal{C})$ $\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{Z}^2}$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}$ $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}{\mathcal{L}}$ $\frac{\alpha^2}{2\pi^2} \left(1-\frac{1}{2}\right)^2$ $\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{R}^2}$

$\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{A})$ $\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$ $\mathbb{N}^{\mathbb{N}}$

$\mathbf{X} = \mathbf{X} \times \mathbf{X} \times \mathbf{X}$ $\mathcal{J}_\tau^{\pm}$ as a fair

$\cdot \cdot$

$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}$

    1. One CC to SRI. MANOHAR REDDY MALLASANI Advocate [OPUC] ~
    1. One spare copy

PSR

HIGH COURT

RRR,J

DATED: 05/09/2023

NOTE: LIST THE MATTER ON 05.10.2023.

ORDER

$\mathbf{r}$

CC.No.2494 of 2022

$\mathcal{I}, \mathcal{I}^{\mathcal{A}}$

$\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}$

$\mathcal{L}_{\text{tot}}$

DIRECTION

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(11) - 26 Mar 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(10) - 27 Feb 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(8) - 5 Oct 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(9) - 5 Oct 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(6) - 5 Sept 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(7) - 5 Sept 2023

Interim Order

Viewing

Order(5) - 22 Aug 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 31 Jul 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 21 Feb 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 7 Sept 2022

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 7 Sept 2022

Interim Order

Click to view