Meesala Mary Kumari vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Subba Reddy Satti
Case Status:Withdrawn
Order Date:31 Jul 2024
CNR:APHC010157642024
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Orders
Before:
Hon'ble Subba Reddy Satti
Listed On:
31 Jul 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE : W.P.No.8021 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET
| Sl.<br>No. | Date | ORDER | OFFICE<br>NOTE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6. | 31.07.2024 | SRS,J | |
| Heard Sri J.V. Phaniduth, learned counsel for | |||
| the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader | |||
| for<br>Services-IV<br>for<br>respondents<br>1<br>to<br>3; | |||
| Sri K. Sreedhara Murthy, learned standing counsel for | |||
| respondent<br>Nos.4<br>and<br>5<br>and<br>Sri<br>R.<br>Venkatesh, | |||
| learned counsel for respondent Nos.6 to 8. | |||
| At the hearing, learned standing counsel has | |||
| drawn<br>the<br>attention<br>of<br>this<br>court<br>to<br>the<br>regular | |||
| employee details filed at page No.9 of the counter | |||
| affidavit<br>of respondent No.4, whereby deceased | |||
| uploaded<br>photos<br>and<br>particulars<br>of<br>his<br>family | |||
| members. He also drew the attention of this Court<br>to | |||
| the marriage certificate produced by the deceased | |||
| before the Corporation. | |||
| A<br>perusal<br>of<br>the<br>regular<br>employee<br>details | |||
| discloses that deceased married respondent No.6<br>in | |||
| the year 1992<br>and they were blessed with respondent | |||
| Nos.7 and 8. | |||
| The<br>contention<br>of<br>learned<br>counsel<br>for<br>the | |||
| petitioner is that the marriage between the deceased | |||
| and the petitioner was performed in the year, 2002 | |||
| and that it is valid marriage. | |||
| However, a perusal of the documents<br>placed | |||
| before this Court,<br>would prima facie indicate that even |
if the deceased had contracted marriage with the petitioner, it is only subsisting the first marriage. These questions will be adjudicated by the Civil Court, but not by the this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to get instructions from the petitioner as to whether the petitioner wants to proceed with the matter or withdraw the writ petition. Post on 07.08.2024, under the caption. ______ SRS, J Ikn
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search