IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ^ TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6081 OF 2012 o ■0

Between:

M.S.Sastry, S/o late Venkatappaiah, Driver E.350842, APSRTC Guntur-2 Depot, Guntur District

...PETITIONER

/

»7 7!

AND

• 1. The APSRTC, rep.by its VC & MD, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Guntur Region, Guntur District
• 3. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Bapatia Depot, Guntur District

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order No.Steno/19(41)/04-RM(G), dt.06.10.2004 passed by Regional Manager, Guntur and set-aside the same as being bad, illegal, without jurisdiction and invalid and consequently direct the respondents to release the two increments and treat the period from the date of suspension to till the date of reporting duty as On Duty and direct the respondents to extent all consequential benefits including back wages

I.A. NO: ¹ OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 7733 OF 20121

Petition under Section ¹⁵¹ CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the two increments by treating the period from the date of suspension to till the reinstatement as On Duty

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. KAMBHAM MADHAVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K SATYANARAYANA MURTHY The Court made the following: ORDER

APHC010125782012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 6081/2012

Between: $M.s.sastry$ ,

...PETITIONER

AND

...RESPONDENT(S)

The Apsrtc Rep By Its Vc Md and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAM MADHAVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): $1.$

The Court made the following Order:

Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there was no representation for the petitioner.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-

prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall

stand closed.

Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

IITRUE COPYII

To.

• 1. VC & MD, The APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.
• 2. The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Guntur Region, Guntur District
• 3. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Bapatla Depot, Guntur District
• 4. One CC to SRI. KAMBHAM MADHAVA REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
• 5. One CC to SRI K SATYANARAYANA MURTHY. Advocate [OPUC]
• Three CD Conies $\mathsf{G}$

HIGH COURT

DATED;21/01/2025

ORDER

WP.No.6081 of 2012

DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS