IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO

WRIT PETITION NO: 2888 OF 2021

Between:

Dr.S.V.Rama Murthy, S/o Late S.V.Prasada Rao, Aged about ⁵⁶ years, R/o. Saluru, Vizayanagaram District.

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Medical and Health Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Mandal, Guntur District.
• 2. The Andhra Pradesh, Vaidya Vidhana Parishat, Gollapudi, Vijayawada.
• 3. The Director of Public Health and Famiily Welfare, Gollapudi, Vijayawada.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or orders, direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Vaidya Vidhana Parishat in not completing the selection of civil surgeon(paediatric) is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the Vaidya Vidhana Parishat to complete the selection of promotion process for the post of CS(P).

lA NO: ¹ OF 2021

Petition under Section ¹⁵¹ CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court

may be pleased to direct the vaidya Vidhana Parishat take steps to promote the petitioner as Civil surgeon( Paediatrician), to from DPC and *■

0

j; 4 ^I Counsef ^or the Petitioner: SRI P. BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER

4

I

\

APHC010038632021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3310]

THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

WRIT PETITION NO: 2888/2021

Between:

...PETITIONER Dr.s.v.rama Murthy,

AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT{S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.P BHASKAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR SERVICES III

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.K.V.Ramani, learned counsel, representing Mr.P.Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.

2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.

Sd/- P.U.V.BHASKAR RAO assistant registrar //TRUE COPY//

f^3^SECTION OFFICER

To

1. One CC to Sri P. Bhaskar, Advocate [OPUC]

2. TwoCCsto GP for Services III, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

3. Three C.D. Copies.

Cnr

HIGH COURT

DATED:02/01/2025

ORDER

WP.No.2888 of 2021

DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCUTOUS WITHOUT COSTS