Sohail Akhtar vs. Union Of India

ITEM NO.52+53+58

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

COURT NO.15

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).9577-9579/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-03-2023 in WPC No. 9493/2020 27-03-2023 in WPC No. 4116/2022 14-03-2023 in WPC No. 8526/2022 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)

GAUTAM SETHI & ORS.

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

([TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH SLP(C) No. 9194/2023]..............FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.94151/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.94150/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )

WITH

SLP (C) No.9194/2023

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.91041/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.91034/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )

SLP(C) No. 9313/2023 (XIV)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.91768/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.91767/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

SLP(C) No. 9409/2023

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.92592/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.92593/2023-PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS)

Date: 08-05-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL

ignature Not Verified<br>igitally signed by<br>IRMALA NEGI<br>ate: 2023.05.08<br>7:39:32 IST<br>eason: 🛏	For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aditya Parolia, Adv.
	Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv.
	Mr. Akshay Srivastava, Adv.
	Ms. Kashish Sareen, Adv.
	Ms. Sumbul Ismail, Adv.
	Mr. Rishabh Govalia, Adv.
	Mr. Alankrit Bhatnagar, Adv.
	Mr. Javant Jain, Adv.

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.

SECTION XIV

Respondent $(s)$

Petitioner(s)

Mr. Gaurav Goel, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Pallav Saxena, Adv. Mr. Anoop Prakash Awasthi, AOR Ms. Prapti Singh, Adv. Ms. Parthvi Ahuja, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Issue notice, returnable in four weeks.

Since the petitioners have had the benefit of interim protection from 31.01.2022, till the date on which the impugned order was passed, the petitioners shall be entitled to the benefit of the same interim protection till the next date of hearing.

(RADHA SHARMA) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)