Neha Kothari vs. The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh Principal Seat At Jabalpur
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy, Hon'ble Prashant Kumar Mishra
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List On (Date) [22-07-2024]
Listed On:
18 Mar 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28165/2023
(Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 12-12-2023 in WP No. 30653/2023 passed by the High Court of M.P. Principal Seat at Jabalpur)
NEHA KOTHARI & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR & ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 22-03-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddhartha R. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Divyanshu Kumar Srivastava, AOR
- For Respondent(s) Mr. Arjun Garg, AOR Mr. Aakash Nandolia, Adv. Ms. Sagun Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Kriti Gupta, Adv.
- Mr. Sunny Choudhary, AOR Mr. Karan Bishnoi, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Heard Mr. Arjun Garg, learned counsel appearing for the High Court of Madhya Pradesh.
2. Limited notice was issued in this case to allow the petitioners to write their written examination. The result of the written examination is notified by the Registrar (Exams) of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh which indicates that the cut-off marks for the open category is 113 out of total 150 marks. Digitally signed by NITIN TALREJA Date: 2024.03.23 12:15:32 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
1
3. The result of the written examination of the two petitioners is produced by the learned counsel in a sealed cover and it shows that their marks in the written examination is much below the cutoff marks. In these circumstances, further adjudication of the present matter is considered unnecessary. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed.
4. The result produced in a sealed cover is returned back to the learned counsel, representing the High Court.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand closed.
(NITIN TALREJA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR