Abhishek Agarwal vs. State Of Uttarakhand
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Surya Kant, Hon'ble K.V. Viswanathan
Stage:
BAIL MATTERS
Remarks:
Disposed off
Listed On:
23 Feb 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.4 SECTION II-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).16316/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24-11-2023 in ABA No.882/2023 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital)
ABHISHEK AGARWAL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Respondent(s)
(IA No.260926/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.260927/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 23-02-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
18:13:20 IST
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Siddharth Dave, Sr. Adv.<br>Ms. Nidhi Agarwal, Adv.<br>Mr. Hitesh Nagar, Adv.<br>Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, AOR |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR<br>Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv.<br>Ms. Adviteeya Sharma, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. Heard learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State and carefully perused the material placed on record.
2. It is not in dispute that the investigation is complete; chargesheet has been filed and the petitioner is no longer required for investigation purposes. Digitally signed by satish kumar yadav Date: 2024.02.23 Signature Not Verified
3. In this view of the matter, the interim protection granted to the petitioner vide order dated 02.01.2024 is made absolute, and he shall continue on bail during the pending of the Reason:
trial, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall furnish one additional surety, who should be a local solvent person and a permanent resident of the State of Uttarakhand. (ii) The petitioner shall continue to appear before the Trial Court regularly unless granted exemption.
4. The Special Leave Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
5. As a result, the pending interlocutory applications stand disposed of.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)