Ashok Kumar Kalra vs. Savita Kalra

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Surya Kant
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:13 Dec 2023
CNR:SCIN010497802023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

13 Dec 2023

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.28

COURT NO.5 $\mathbf{5}$

SECTION IV-B

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ....................................

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-11-2022 in LPA No.1038/2022 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Harvana at Chandigarh)

ASHOK KIIMAR KAIRA

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SAVITA KALRA & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.255947/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.255948/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT $\quad\text{and}\quad$ No.255949/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

Date: 13-12-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Adv. Ms. Sneha Rani, Adv. Ms. Sheetal Rajput, Adv. Mr. Uttam Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satayam Singh Rajput, Adv. Mr. Thomas Oommen, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully perused the material placed on record.

$\mathbf{2}$ Delay condoned.

3. The instant petition is directed against an interlocutory <pre>% dated 18.11.2022, passed by the High Court of Punjab and</pre> $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$ $\frac{1}{2}$

$\mathbf{4}$ . In our considered view, no case to interfere with the impugned order is made out.

$5.$ The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 6. The petitioner, if so advised, may approach the High Court for early disposal of the pending appeal. 7. As a sequel to the above, the pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)