Union Of India vs. A. V. Rajamma

ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.9 SECTION XI-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO. 49480/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-05-2023 in MFA (SCSTCC) No. 125/2005 & MFA (SCSTCC) No. 142/2005 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam)

UNION OF INDIA PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

A.V. RAJAMMA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.90428/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.90429/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.90432/2024-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.90431/2024-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.90438/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No.90436/2024-APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT and IA No.90434/2024-APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT )

Date : 17-05-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

For Petitioner(s)

Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.(Not present) Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Rekha Pandey, Adv. Ms. Gayatri Mishra, Adv. Mr. Prashant Rawat, Adv. Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R

• 1. Permission to file the petitions for Special Leave to Appeal is granted.
• 2. Delay condoned.
• 3. Applications for substitution, delay in filing the application for setting aside

abatement and abatement are allowed. Cause title be amended accordingly.

4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined

to interfere with the common judgement impugned herein under Article 136

of the Constitution of India.

• 5. The petitions for Special Leave to Appeal are dismissed.
• 6. Pending application, if any, is disposed of.

(POOJA SHARMA) (NAND KISHOR)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)