M. F. Peter vs. P. Venkateswarlu
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Abhay S. Oka, Hon'ble Ujjal Bhuyan
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List On (Date) [29-04-2024]
Listed On:
15 Mar 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
1
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).28060-28061/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-10-2023 in WP Nos.12538/1999 and 25738/1997 passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad)
M.F. PETER & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
P. VENKATESWARLU & ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 15-03-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. P. Mohith Rao, Adv. Ms. K. Akshitha, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR Mr. Kumar Shashank, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. M Srinivas R Rao, Adv. Mr. Abid Ali Beeran P, AOR Mr. Saswat Adhyapak, Adv. Mr. Joydip Bhattacharya, Adv.
Ms. Devina Sehgal, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks time to take instructions whether the petitioners are in a position to provide another site on which park can be made. Signature Not Verified
To enable him to take instructions, list on 29th April, 2024. No further time shall be granted. Digitally signed by Anita Malhotra Date: 2024.03.18 17:01:46 IST Reason:
We make it clear that that the issue whether the petitioners can develop the park on the same property also needs consideration.
We direct respondent No.5 to depute its appropriate officer to the site to find out whether there is any open space available in Survey No.194/11 where a park could be made. The report shall be submitted by the fifth respondent before the next date.
(ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER