Orris Infrastructure Private Limited vs. Bhitika Gupta
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Dipankar Datta
Stage:
ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)
Remarks:
IA Allowed [244882/2023,244885/2023], List Before Chamber [CA restore to its original file.]
Listed On:
12 Aug 2023
In:
Chamber
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
244882/2023, 244885/2023,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.1706 COURT NO.5 SECTION XVII-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IA 244728/2023,244729/2023, in MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION Diary No(s). 49050/2023
ORRIS INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
PAWAN GUPTA & ANR. Respondent(s) IA No. 244729/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION IA No. 244728/2023 - RESTORATION)
WITH
Diary No(s). 49064/2023 (XVII-A) ( FOR RESTORATION ON IA 244882/2023 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION ON IA 244885/2023 IA No. 244885/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION IA No. 244882/2023 – RESTORATION)
Diary No(s). 48879/2023 (XVII-A) ( FOR RESTORATION ON IA 243858/2023 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION ON IA 243859/2023 IA No. 243859/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION IA No. 243858/2023 - RESTORATION)
Date : 08-12-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
Date: 2023.12.12
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA [IN CHAMBER]
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Sr. Adv. Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Adv. Ms. Ankita Rastogi, Adv. Mr. Deepak Singh, Adv. Mr. Rishi Kapoor, AOR
For Respondent(s) Ms. Ruchira Goel, AOR Digitally signed by Jatinder Kaur Signature Not Verified
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA No. 244728/2023 & IA No. 244729/2023 in M.A. Diary No. 49050 of 10:55:21 IST Reason:
2023 in Civil Appeal D.No.7884 of 2023:
1. An application for restoration and another application seeking condonation of delay in presenting the restoration application are on board.
2. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay condoned.
3. Since it appears from the Office Report dated 1.12.2023 that the defects have been cured by the applicants, the order dated 17.7.2023 stands recalled and the Civil Appeal stands restored to its original diary number.
4. The applications for restoration and condonation of delay in filing restoration application are, accordingly, allowed.
IA No. 244882/2023 & IA No. 244885/2023 in M.A. Diary No. 49064 of 2023 in Civil Appeal D.No.7885 of 2023:
5. An application for restoration and another application seeking condonation of delay in presenting the restoration application are on board.
6. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay condoned.
7. Since it appears from the Office Report dated 1.12.2023 that the defects have been cured by the applicants, the order dated 17.7.2023 stands recalled and the Civil Appeal stands restored to its original diary number.
8. The applications for restoration and condonation of delay in filing restoration application are, accordingly, allowed.
IA No. 243858/2023 & IA No. 243859/2023 in M.A. Diary No. 48879 of 2023 in Civil Appeal D.No.7886 of 2023:
2
9. An application for restoration and another application seeking condonation of delay in presenting the restoration application are on board.
10. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay condoned.
11. Since it appears from the Office Report dated 1.12.2023 that the defects have been cured by the applicants, the order dated 17.7.2023 stands recalled and the Civil Appeal stands restored to its original diary number.
12. The applications for restoration and condonation of delay in filing restoration application are, accordingly, allowed.
13. List the appeals [Civil Appeal D. No. 7884-7886 of 2023] before the appropriate Bench in due course.
(JATINDER KAUR) (BEENA JOLLY)
P.S. to REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)