Maturi Srikanth vs. K Prakash
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Abhay S. Oka, Hon'ble Ujjal Bhuyan
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
IA Allowed [52538/2025], List On (Date) [25-03-2025], List before court/bench [as per ROP]
Listed On:
28 Feb 2025
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
284550/2024,284715/2024,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).26996-27007/2024
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-08-2024 in WP Nos.32017/2023, 32014/2023, 19341/2023, 5509/2024, 10031/2024, 29104/2023, 31728/2023, 17910/2024, 16229/2024, 16846/2024, 18647/2024 and 13928/2024 passed by the High Court for The State of Telangana at Hyderabad]
MATURI SRIKANTH & ORS. ETC. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 284715/2024 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 284550/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No.52538/2025 - IMPEADMENT IA No.52412/2025 - TRANSPOSITION OF RESPONDENTS AS PETITIONERS IA No.52577/2025 - INTERVENTION)
Date : 28-02-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
Signature Not Verified
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Basa Mithun Shashank, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta, AOR
For Respondent(s) :
Mr. K Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Devina Sehgal, AOR Mr. Vineet George, Adv.
Mr. Manish Tiwari, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
IA No.52538 of 2025
The learned counsel appearing for the applicants/ petitioners states that the applicants were the writ Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date: 2025.03.04 18:44:52 IST Reason:
1
petitioners before the High Court on which the impugned common judgment has been passed. In view of this statement, we allow the application in terms of prayer clause (A) which reads thus:
"A. Allow the present application and implead the applicants as Petitioners in the Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.26996 of 2024."
IA No.52412 of 2025
The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) which reads thus:
"A. Allow the present application and transpose the Respondent Nos.33, 33, 34, 36, 37, 41, 42, 49, 50, 51, 54, 56, 58, 26, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 83, 86, 92, 93, 94, 98, 119, 120, 121, 122, 127, 133, 136, 142, 143, 144, 147, 148, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 158, 164, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 175, 176, 177, 182, 183, 186, 187, 188, 189, 191, 193, 200, 202, 204, 212, 213, 216, 219, 221, 222, 223, 224, 236, 241, 247, 249, 254, 255, 258, 261, 262, 265, 270, 271, 272, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 282, 292, 299, 302, 303, 308, 310, 311, 314, 315, 321, 322, 323, 324, 327, 330, 336, 340, 341, 348, 365 and 363 as Petitioners in the Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.26996 of 2024."
IA No.52577 of 2025
The applicants had never approached the High Court. Hence, the application is rejected.
2
List the petitions on a non-miscellaneous day i.e. 25th March, 2025.
(ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER