The Central Bureau Of Investigation vs. Navneet Gupta

ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.15 SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s).1231/2024

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-07-2023 in WP No.23800/2021, WP No.28645/2019, WP No.17190/2020, WP No.17195/2020, WP No.24984/2021 and WP No.25083/2021 passed by the High Court of M.P. at Indore)

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SURENDRA PATWA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No.56911/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.56907/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.56913/2024-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.56914/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)

Date : 05-04-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, A.S.G. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv. Ms. Shruti Agarwal, Adv. Mr. B.K. Satija, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma - (II), Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

• 1. In the instant set of SLPs, only one Diary Number is given in respect of six SLPs, arising out of the common impugned order.
• 2. There are some I.A.s filed seeking permission to file SLPs, seeking condonation of delay in filing - refiling SLPs etc., however there is no clarity as to which I.A. has been filed in respect of which SLP. Digitally signed by RAVI ARORA Date: 2024.04.08 15:38:51 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

1

• 3. Such confusions are invariably created in case of group matters arising out of a common judgment of the High Court in Land acquisition matters. In many cases, even separate cause titles are also not filed in the SLPs. We have passed orders in other matters directing the Registry to look into the matter and work out some better method or system for registering the I.A.s and SLPs separately with absolute clarity as to which I.A. is filed in which SLP and which SLP is arising out of which proceedings of the High Court/ Tribunal or any other forum.
• 4. Till the Registry undertakes the exercise of finding out better method/ system, following directions are given –
  • (i) Registry shall register each SLP giving separate numbers though arising out of common impugned order, and shall give separate Diary number for each SLP whenever there are defects in the SLPs.
  • (ii) The SLP Petitioners shall file separate cause title for each SLP if arising out of a common impugned order, so that each SLP can be separately numbered.
  • (iii) The SLP Petitioners shall file separate I.A.s for each of the SLPs arising out of common impugned order, clearly mentioning as to which I.A. is filed in which SLP.
• 5. List the matter(s) after two weeks after separately registering the SLPs and I.A.s with clarity as to which I.A. is filed in which SLP.

(RAVI ARORA) (MAMTA RAWAT) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

2