R. Dhanalakshmi vs. The Home Secretary

ITEM NO.18

COURT NO.8

SECTION II-C

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 14604/2023

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-10-2023 in WP No. 29444/2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras]

R. DHANALAKSHMI

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE HOME SECRETARY & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

Date: 04-03-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL

• For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dr. S. Muralidhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prasanna S., AOR Mr. Henri Tiphagne (vc), Adv. Mr. M.a. Karthik, Adv. Ms. Ninni Susan Thomas (vc), Adv. Mr. Maitreya Subramanian, Adv. Ms. Pallak Bhagat, Adv.
• For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

We have heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the parties.

Considering the peculiar facts of the case, we $not$ $are$ inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. However, we record the statement made by the learned senior Image: Missel appearing for the respondents that no false case has been 18:00 F Sisted against the petitioner's son.

If any case(s) are pending against the petitioner's son, required higher jurisdictional officer at the the rank of Superintendent of Police, shall review the same and find out as to whether such case(s) have been foisted against the petitioner's son only for the reason that the petitioner has been pursuing the present case against the concerned police officers.

The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR