Arunangshu Chakraborty vs. High Court At Calcutta, Adjudicator At Culcutta

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:6 Dec 2024
CNR:SCIN010444942024

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Surya Kant, Hon'ble Ujjal Bhuyan

Stage:

FRESHLY / ADJOURNED MATTERS

Remarks:

Delay Condoned and matter dismissed(including all pending IAs)

Listed On:

12 Jun 2024

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

247628/2024,247629/2024,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

COURT NO.3

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos.14916-14917/2024

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2024 in MAT No.962/2024 11-09-2024 in CAN No. 1/2024 passed by the High Court at Calcuttal

ARUNANGSHU CHAKRABORTY

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA, ADJUDICATOR AT CULCUTTA Respondent $(s)$

(IA No.247628/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 247629/2024 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON)

WITH

Diary No(s). 44482/2024 (II-B) (IA No. 264328/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING/CURING THE DEFECTS, IA No. 264326/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 264327/2024 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON, IA No. 264325/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

SLP(C) No. 27450/2024 (XVI) (IA No. 265564/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 265562/2024 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON)

Date: 06-12-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

For Petitioner(s) Petitioner-in-person

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. The petitioner is present in-person through video-Image: Text of the permission to appear and argue in-person is granted. 17.38M<sup>S</sup> have heard him for some time.

$\mathbf{1}$

2. Delay condoned.

3. During the course of hearing, the petitioner graciously states that he will tender an unconditional apology before the High Court for the misgivings which have happened. We have no reason to doubt that in the event of the petitioner being repentant for the unfortunate past incidents and upon unconditional apology being tendering by him, the High Court will show its magnanimity.

4. With these observations, the special leave petitions are disposed of.

5. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

(ARJUN BISHT) (PREETHI T.C.) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR