Eicl Ltd vs. The State Of Kerala
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.14
COURT NO.2
SECTION XI-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 31834-31838/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-10-2018 in WA No. 1099/2010 04-10-2018 in WA No. 1761/2018 04-10-2018 in WP(C) No. 8843/2013 04-10-2018 in WP(C) No. 3251/2015 04-10-2018 in WP(C) No. 32230/2015 passed by the High Court of Kerala At Ernakulam)
$M/S$ EICL LTD
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.173510/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.173525/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES No.173508/2018-PERMISSION $\mathbf{T}\mathbf{O}$ and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )
Date : 07-01-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Raghenth Basant, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Mithun Verghis, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Amit Krishnan, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR | ||
For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Parameshwar, AOR Mr. Harish Vasudevan, Adv. Mr. M.V. Mukunda, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
After arguing the matter for quite some time, Mr. V. Giri, riving the petitioner seeks leave to Thdraw these petitions. Permission granted.
The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. At this stage, Mr. V. Giri, learned senior counsel, submits that the petitioner will like to file Review Petition in the High Court. It is up to the petitioner to take such course of action, if permissible in law. This Court has not made any observation with regard to the intending move of the petitioner.
(SUSHIL KUMAR RAKHEJA) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS BRANCH OFFICER