Chairman Cum Managing Director, Northern Coalfields Ltd vs. Anjani Jaiswal

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Rohinton Fali Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:7 Sept 2020
CNR:SCIN010429572019

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

After Week/Month/Vacation

Before:

Hon'ble Rohinton Fali Nariman, Hon'ble S. Ravindra Bhat

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

List On (Date) [27-03-2020]

Listed On:

20 Feb 2020

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.2 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE

Civil Appeal No(s). 3191/2020

ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY Appellant(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

Date : 07-12-2020 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s)

Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following

O R D E R

Spare copies have not been filed. Ld. Counsel for the appellant seeks two weeks' time to file spare copies. Granted. In addition, service is also allowed in terms of order dated 10.7.2020 in SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (C)NO.3/2020 passed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India which reads as follows -

"…. I.A.No.48461/2020 – Service of all notices, summons and exchange of pleadings.

Service of notices, summons and exchange of pleadings/documents, is a requirement of virtually every legal proceeding. Service of notices, summons and pleadings etc. have not been possible during the period of lockdown because this involves visits to post offices, courier companies or physical delivery of notices, summons and pleadings. We, therefore, consider it appropriate to direct that such services Digitally signed by Anil Laxman Pansare Date: 2020.12.08 16:52:28 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

of all the above may be effected by e-mail, FAX, commonly used instant messaging services, such as Whatsapp, Telegram, Signal etc. However, if a party intends to effect service by means of said instant messaging services, we direct that in addition thereto, the party must also effect service of the same document/documents by e-mail, simultaneously on the same date…..."

Ld. Counsel for the appellant to file affidavit of service to that effect within four weeks.

List again on 14.1.2021.

ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(26) - 14 May 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 26 Feb 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 19 Feb 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 29 Jun 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(22) - 5 Apr 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(21) - 22 Feb 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 18 Jan 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 7 Dec 2020

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 27 Oct 2020

ROP

Click to view

Order(17) - 15 Oct 2020

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 12 Oct 2020

ROP

Click to view

Order(15) - 9 Oct 2020

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 8 Oct 2020

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 22 Sept 2020

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 7 Sept 2020

ROP

Viewing

Order(11) - 19 Aug 2020

ROP

Click to view

Order(10) - 20 Feb 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 6 Dec 2019

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 2 Dec 2019

ROP

Click to view

Order(7) - 25 Nov 2019

ROP

Click to view

Order(6) - 8 Nov 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 7 Nov 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 5 Nov 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 1 Jul 2019

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 28 Jun 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 22 Apr 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data