K. Nagi Reddy vs. The State Of Telangana

'ITEM NO.57 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12616- 12618/2010 GOVERNMENT OF A.P. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAO V.B.J.CHELIKANI & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report ) WITH SLP(C) NO. 12165-12167 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief) SLP(C) NO. 12753-12755 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 13232-13234 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 14440 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 16073-16075 of 2010 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 16155-16157 of 2010 (With office report) Date: 17/09/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. C.K. Sucharita,Adv. Ms.Nirada Das, Mr. Ugra Shankar Prasad,Adv. Mr.Manish Mohan,Adv. Mr.K.N.Sinha,Adv. Mr. Rajeev Sharma Mr. R. Nedumaran Mr.Kumar Dushyant Singh,Adv. Ms. Promila For Respondent(s) M/S. Mclm & Co.,Adv. Mr. T.V. Ratnam ,Adv Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain Ms.Firdouse Q.Wani,Adv. Mr.Rajeev Sharma,Adv. ITEM NO.57 -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) Nos.12616-12618/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has remitted the process fee which was delayed by two days. Ld.counsel for the petitioner submits that she has filed today an application for condonation of delay for remitting the process fee. Respondent No.4 has filed vakalatnama. It is seen defective.

four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) Nos. 12165-12167/10 and 12753-12755/10 petitioner has cured the defects, but is delayed by four days. No application for condonation of delay is filed. Petitioner is directed to file an application for condonation of delay within two weeks from

Respondent is granted two weeks time for curing the defects and

today as last chance. In the meanwhile, the served respondents may file counter affidavit. Respondent No.6 has filed vakalatnama which is seen to be defective. Granted two weeks time for curing the defects. In SLP(C) No.13232-13234/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has remitted the process fee which is less than the actual fee payable. Hence the petitioner is directed to cure the defects within two weeks from today as last chance. Respondent Nos.10-12 have appeared. Granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No.3 has filed vakalatnama, but is defective. Respondent is granted two weeks time for curing the defects. In SLP(C) No.14440/10 respondent Nos. 8 & 11 have been served and filed vakalatnama. Granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Notice has been served on Respondent Nos. 4-9. The above respondents are granted four weeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Await return of notice of Respondent Nos.1-3 and 10-12. contd....2

ITEM NO.57 -2-

In SLP(C) No.16073-16075/10 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has cured the defects which is belated and no application for condonation of delay has been filed. Granted two weeks time for filing an application for condonation of delay. The remaining respondents who have filed vakalatnama, granted four weeks time

for filing counter affidavit. In SLP(C) Nos.16155-16157/10 petitioner has belatedly cured the defects. No application for condonation of delay is filed. Granted two weeks time for filing the proper application. The respondent Nos.3-5 and 9 have filed vakalatnama. Granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No.3 has appeared through advocate but the vakalatnama is seen defective. Cure the defects within two weeks. Ld.counsel for the Respondent No.3 submits that the copy of the pleadings have not been served on him. Petitioner to serve copy within a week and respondent to file counter affidavit within four weeks thereafter.

List the matter on 12.11.2010.

(Sunil Thomas) Registrar

SB