Anoop Prabhakar vs. Union Of India Through Secretary

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL No(s). 2318 OF 2006

UNION OF INDIA

Appellant(s)

VERSUS

MALAY SHUKLA & ANR. ETC.

Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Six weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to file application for substituted service in respect of respondent No.1. If the compliance is not made within the stipulated time, the appeal shall stand dismissed $\alpha$ ua respondent No.1 without further reference to the Court.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J . ( ABHAY S. OKA)

NEW DELHI JANUARY 13, 2023 ITEM NO.1723 COURT NO.2 SECTION III-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2286/2006 ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR FAIZAN MUSTAFA Appellant(s) VERSUS NARESH AGARWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. NOs. 2321, 2320 and 2318/2006 are to be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers ) WITH C.A. No. 2321/2006 (III-A) ( FOR SUBSTITUTED SERVICE ON IA 151150/2022) C.A. No. 2320/2006 (III-A) ( FOR SUBSTITUTED SERVICE ON IA 151153/2022) C.A. No. 2318/2006 (III-A) Date : 13-01-2023 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. T. V. S. Raghavendra Sreyas, AOR Ms. Gayatri Gulati, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. R. C. Kohli, AOR Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, AOR Mr. T. V. S. Raghavendra Sreyas, AOR M/S. Equity Lex Associates, AOR

Mrs. Naghma Imtiaz, Adv. Mr. Zargham Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Saif Naseem, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR M/S. Equity Lex Associates, AOR Mrs. Naghma Imtiaz, Adv. Mr. Zargham Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Saif Naseem, Adv.

M/S. Equity Lex Associates, AOR Mrs. Naghma Imtiaz, Adv. Mr. Zargham Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Saif Naseem, Adv.

Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

C.A. No. 2321/2006

Time of four weeks is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to serve notice by way of publication in respect of respondent nos. 1, 4 and 12 in terms of the order dated 30.11.2022.

C.A. No. 2320/2006

Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.3,6,7,8 & 12 states that respondent No. 7 is no more. Hence there is no requirement of service of publication notice on respondent no.7.

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant prayed for deletion the name of respondent no.7 from the array of parties.

As prayed, name of respondent No. 7 is deleted from the array of parties at the risk and responsibility of the appellant.

Amended cause title be filed within one week.

Time of four weeks is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to serve notice by way of publication in respect of respondent nos. 3,6,8 & 12.

C.A. No. 2318/2006

Six weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to file application for substituted service in respect of respondent No.1. If the compliance is not made within the stipulated time, the appeal shall stand dismissed qua respondent No.1 without further reference to the Court.

(NEELAM GULATI) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) (Signed order in C.A. No. 2318/2006 is placed on the file)