Anoop Prabhakar vs. Union Of India Through Secretary

2ITEM NO.302 (MM) IN COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 2286/2006 ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY Appellant(s) VERSUS NARESH AGARWAL & ORS. Respondent(s) (WITH APPLN. FOR INTERVENTION) WITH C.A. No. 2316/2006 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) C.A. No. 2317/2006 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2318/2006 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2319/2006 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2320/2006 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2321/2006 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 2861/2006 Date : 04/04/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For the appearing parties: Mr. P.P.Rao,Sr.Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhawan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Nikhil Nayyar,Adv. Mr. Ambay Agarwal,Adv. Mr. Dhananjay aijal,Adv. Mr. N.Sai Vinod,Adv. -2- Mr. Mukul Rohtagi,A.G. Ms. V.Mohana,Sr.Adv. Ms. Madhvi Diwan,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. Mr. Saurabh Kripal,Adv. Mr. D.S.Mahra,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Ajesh K.Chawla,Adv. Mr. Mohan Pandey,Adv. Mr. B. Barqi,Adv. Mr. Z.K.Fizan,Adv. Mr. Altaf Ali Khan,Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. For the applicant: Mr. Salman Khursheed,Sr.Adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmad Syed,Adv. Mr. Syed Ahmad Saud,Adv. Mr. Mohd Parvez Dabas,Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain,Adv. In IA No.5&6: Mr. Salman Khurshid,Sr.Adv. Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed,Adv. Mrs. Naghma Imtiaz,Adv. Ms. Amra Moosavi,Adv.for M/s. Equity Lex Associates. M/s. S.S.Shamshery, Vikramjit Banerjee, D.Bharat Kumar,Ishu Prayash, Prakash Gautam, Prateek Yadav and R.C.Kohli,Advs. Mr. Abhinav Mukerji,Adv. Mr. Radha Shyam Jena,Adv.

Ms. Garima Prashad,Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In I.A. Nos. 4, 5 and 6: Learned counsel for the applicants in these -3 applications are allowed to intervene and assist this Court in the final decision of the case. The learned counsel for the appellant in Civil Appeal No. 2318/2006 states that he needs to file an application along with an affidavit seeking further orders in this appeal and that he be permitted eight weeks' time to do the needful. Mr. P.P. Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for Aligarh Muslim University states that he may also be permitted to file counter affidavit to such application, and he be granted four weeks' time to do so thereafter. Time as sought is granted. The needful be done within the time sought. List all these matters after the ensuing summer vacation. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (RENUKA SADANA) COURT MASTER