T. C. Nallasamy vs. R. Ponnusamy (Died) Through Lrs

ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.7 SECTION XII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1686/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-10-2022 in CMP No. 11250/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras)

T.C.NALLASAMY Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

R.PONNUSAMY (DIED) THROUGH LRS, & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.14001/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT )

Date : 30-01-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR Mr. Tushar Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Amartya Bhushan, Adv. Mr. K. Varadharajan, Adv. Ms. Kharunya, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R

Issue notice, returnable in the month of July, 2023.

Notices would be served by all modes, including dasti.

Learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has relied upon the decision of this Court in "Gurmit Singh Bhatia v. Kiran Kant Robinson and Others," (2020) 13 SCC 773. On instructions, it is stated by the learned Senior Advocate that the petitioners are aware that R. Manoharan (respondent no.9) will not Digitally signed by BABITA PANDEY Date: 2023.02.02 17:26:12 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

be bound by the decision in the suit, now the subject matter of appeal, because he claims his title through a different vendor. The petitioners will be bound by the said statement and in case they withdraw the said statement, the special leave petition/appeal will be dismissed.

(BABITA PANDEY) COURT MASTER (SH)

(R.S. NARAYANAN) COURT MASTER (NSH)