Collector vs. Liquidator, Petrofils Co-Operative Ltd.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) Special Leave to Appeal $(C)$ No(s). $\hbox{\tt for}$ 34950-34952/2015
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23/10/2015 in MCA No. 1412/2015 23/10/2015 in MCA No. 1900/2015 23/10/2015 in MCA No. 1413/2015 in SCA No. 4353/2008 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad)
AVANI INFRASTRUCTURE
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE COLLECTOR AND ORS. ETC ETC Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to place addl. facts and grounds <pre>and interim relief and office report)</pre> WITH SLP(C) No. 34955-34957/2015(Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 34962-34964/2015(Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. $36240/2015$ (With (With appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. $36252/2015$ (With (With appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Interim Relief and Office Report) <pre>SLP(C) No. 912/2016(Interim Relief and Office Report)</pre> <pre>SLP(C) NO. 18387/2016(with office report)</pre> SLP(C) No. 18386/2016(with office report) Date: 15/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. $CORAM :$ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Vivek Jain, Adv. for Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv. Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv. Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Saransh Kumar, Adv.
for $M/s$ Aura & Co.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok Panigrahi,Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi,Adv. Mr. Dushyant Kr., Adv. for Mr. Rabin Majumder,AOR Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Saransh Kumar, Adv. for M/s Aura & Co. Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
A perusal of the office report reveals, that all the respondent have not yet been served.
Let the unserved respondents be served afresh, in the ordinary course, as well as, dasti process.
Liberty is also granted to the respondents, who have been served, to file their counter affidavits, withtin four weeks from today.
List after service is complete on all the respondents.
(Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar) Court Master AR-cum-PS