Collector vs. Liquidator, Petrofils Co-Operative Ltd.

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).34950-34952/2015

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23/10/2015 in MCA No.1412/2015, MCA No.1413/2015, MCA No.1900/2015 in SCA No. 4353/2008 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad)

AVANI INFRASTRUCTURE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE COLLECTOR AND ORS. ETC ETC Respondent(s)

(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to place addl. facts and grounds and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) Nos.34955-34957/2015 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) Nos.34962-34964/2015 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No.36240/2015 (With appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No.36252/2015 (With appln.(s) for permission to file lengthy list of dates and Interim Relief and Office Report)

Date : 06/01/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN

Mr.Harish N.Salve, Sr.Adv.
Mr.Tushar Mehta, ASG
Mr.Prakash Jani, Adv.
Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv.
Ms.Jesal Wahi, Adv.
Mr.P.Chidamabram, Sr.Adv.
Mr.Sandeep Singhi, Adv.
Mr.Mahesh Agarwal, Adv.
Mr.Vivek Jain, Adv.
Mr.Satyender Kumar, Adv.

Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv.

Respondent(s) Mr.L.N.Rao, Sr.Adv.

Mr.Maninder Singh, ASG Mr.Shiv Mangal Sharma, Adv. Mr.Ankit Shah, Adv. For M/s Aura & Co., Adv.

Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Adv.

Mr.D.N.Ray, Adv. Mr.Hriday Buch, Adv. Mr.Lokesh K.Choudhary, Adv. Mrs.Sumita Ray, Adv.

Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Issue notice.

Mr.Jatin Zaveri, Mrs.Sumita Ray, Mr.Ankit Shah and Ms.Hemantika Wahi, learned counsel accept notice on behalf of their respective respondents. Notice be issued to the unserved respondents, returnable in two weeks. Liberty to serve the unserved respondents through dasti process as well.

Learned counsel for the respondents seeks an adjournment so as to enable them to file counter affidavit.

Prayer is allowed.

Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks.

Status quo**, as it exists today, shall be maintained by all the parties.**

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER