Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited vs. Vodafone Mobile Services Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
10 Apr 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL
Civil Appeal No(s). 10910-10917/2014
UNION OF INDIA ETC Appellant(s)
VERSUS
VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD AND ORS ETC Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 3675-3680/2015 (With appln.(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal. and appln.(s) for c/delay in re-filing appeal and appln.(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal. and appln.(s) for c/delay in re-filing appeal and )
C.A. No. 3646/2015 (With appln.(s) for stay and appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and appln.(s) for permission to file addl. grounds and appln.(s) for c/delay and )
Date : 22/01/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s)
Mr. Ms. Surajita Pattanaik, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Ms. Shivangi Khanna, Adv. Mrs. Suchitra Atul Chitale,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2016.01.29 17:03:23 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Avtar Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Mansoor Ali Shoket, Adv. Mr. Nitin Kala, Adv. Ms. Vibha Dhawan, Adv. Mr. Kunal Singh, Adv. Mr. Sumit Kr. Vats, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Faisal Sherwani, Adv. Mr. V. Shankar, Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan,Adv. Mrs. Suchitra Atul Chitale,Adv. Mr. Akarsh Garg, Adv.
Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain,Adv.
Mr. Pallav P, Adv.
M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Brij Kishor Sah, Adv. M/s. S.m. Jadhav & Company,Adv. Mr. Rohan Pandey, Adv. Mr. L. Kamath, Adv. Ms. Shally Bhasin, Adv. Ms. Arpita Bishnoi, Adv. Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. No. 10910-10917/2014
Three weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent No.1 in C.A. No.10911 and 10916/2014 for curing the defects in the vakalatnama filed by him. Counter affidavit be also filed within the same period.
Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent No.2 for filing counter affidavit in C.A. No.10911/2014.
The office report is silent as far as the status of the other respondents in all the above-said appeals.
C.A. No. 3646/2015
Two weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to the petitioner for serving the proof of service of pleadings to respondent Nos.1 to 4. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks thereafter.
C.A. No. 3675-3680/2015
None appears for respondent No.10 in C.A. No.3675/2015, despite due service.
Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in C.A. No.3676/2015 and respondent No.1 in C.A. No.3680/2015 have to file counter affidavit within four weeks.
Await certificate of service from the concerned Tribunal with regard to service of respondent No.3 in C.A. No.3677/2015. Reminder be issued accordingly.
Registry to submit a detailed report mentioning the status of the other respondents in all the tagged matters.
List again on 7.4.2016.
(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar