ITEM NO.37 <table><tbody>REGISTRAR COURT. 2SECTION IV-B</tbody>

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 18644-18647/2022

DALIP KAUR (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.158107/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $0.T.$ )

WITH

SLP(C) No. $20572 - 20573/2022$ (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.169351/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.169352/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE <pre>IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)</pre>

Diary No(s). 33412/2022 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.161260/2022-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.161259/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.161262/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.)

$SLP(C)$ No. 242/2023 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.198168/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.198170/2022-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.198171/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Date: 17-01-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Parveen Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Singh, Adv. Mr. N D Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Vishal Batra, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, Adv. Mr. V K Shukla, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR

Mr. Apoorva Singhal, AOR

Mr. Siddharth Mittal, AOR Mr. Kshitiz Chauhan, Adv. Ms. Shilpa G. Mittal, Adv. Mr. M. K. Dua, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Ms. Amrita Verma, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv. Mr. Rajat Mishra, Adv. Mr. Avadhesh Kumar Dubey, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following

O R D E R

D. NO. 33412/2022

Fresh matter.

SLP(C) Nos. 18644-18647/2022

Four weeks time, is granted to respondent nos. 1 to 3 to file counter affidavit.

Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos. 4 to 8.

Hence, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

SLP(C) Nos. 20572-73/2022

Four weeks time, is granted to respondent nos. 1 to 3 to file counter affidavit.

Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos. 4, 7 and 8.

Service of notice is not complete upon respondent nos. 5 and 6, as notice could not be delivered and returned with postal remarks "insufficient address". However, Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that he will move application for deletion in respect of said respondents, being proforma respondents. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. Counsel to file the same.

In case the application is filed, process the application for

listing before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers, for further directions.

In case the application is not filed, two weeks time, is granted to Ld counsel for petitioner to take necessary steps for effecting service upon respondent nos. 5 and 6 and list again on 22.02.2023.

SLP(C) Nos. 242/2023

Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent no. 2.

Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for petitioner, to take fresh steps, to serve respondent nos. 1, 3 and 5, as process could not be served.

Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to serve respondent no. 4, as process could not be served with remarks "door locked".

List again on 22.02.2023.

S.P.S. LALER Registrar