The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary vs. Subodh Kumar

ITEM NO.16

COURT NO.11 SECTION XVI SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 20/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31-10-2017 in CWJC No. 21199/2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna)

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

Respondent $(s)$

VERSUS

THE BIHAR SECONDARY TEACHERS STRUGGLE COMMITTEE MUNGER & ORS.

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No. 289/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.10802/2018-impleading party and IA No.29334/2018-INTERVENTION APPLICATION and IA No.33684/2018-impleading party) IA No.35027/2018-INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No.44146/2018-INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No.33684/2018-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No.44129/2018/INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No.36574/2018-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No.36546/2018-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No.35589/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS)

WITH

SLP (C) No.708/2018 (XVI) (FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 14061/2018)

SLP (C) No.240/2018 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.1960/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $0.T.)$

SLP (C) No.238/2018 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.1945/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $0.T.)$

SLP (C) No.242/2018 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.1974/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $0.T.)$

SLP (C) No.169/2018 (XVI)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.1711/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $\begin{bmatrix} \cdot & \cdot \ \cdot & \cdot \ \cdot & \cdot \end{bmatrix}$

SLP (C) No.162/2018 (XVI)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.1550/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING $0.T.)$

SLP (C) No.254/2018 (XVI) (IA No.2085/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP (C) No.164/2018 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.1594/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP (C) No.572/2018 (XVI) (FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 23401/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA 30018/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA 30175/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA 35169/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA 36536/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA 41767/2018) SLP (C) No.251/2018 (XVI) (FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 17867/2018 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 36749/2018) Date : 12-07-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr.Adv. Mr.Gopal Singh, AOR Mr.Manish Kumar, Adv. Mr.Shivam Singh, Adv. Mr.Shyam Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr.Sudhanshu Singh, Adv. Mr.Krishna Kumar Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.K.K.Venugopal, AG (Union of India) Mrs.Madhavi Divan, Adv. Mr.Rohit Bhatt, Adv. Mr.Anmol Chandan, Adv. Mr.G.S.Makker, Adv. Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Adv. Mr.Animesh Kumar, Adv. Mr.Murari Kumar, Adv. Mr.Sumit Kumar, Adv. Mr.Nitesh Ranjan, Adv. Mr.Ravi Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr.Ashutosh Thakur, Adv. Mr.Rana Prashant, Adv. Mr.Neeraj Shekhar, Adv.

Mr.Rajeev Dhavan, Sr.Adv. Mr.V.N.Sinha, Sr.Adv. Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr.Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, Adv. Mr.Animesh Upadhayay, Adv. Mr.V.N.Sinha, Sr.Adv. (For Impleadment) Mr.Harshit Sanwal, Adv. Ms.Akanksha Chandok Verma, Adv. Dr.S.K.Verma, Adv. Dr.Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr.Adv. Mr.C.S.Baidyanathan, Sr.Adv. Mr.Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr.Avishkar Singhvi, Adv. Mr.Ranjit Kumar, Sr.Adv. Mr.Abhay Kumar, Adv. Mr.Himanshu Pal, Adv. Mr.Vineet Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Adv. Mr.Salman Khursid, Sr.Adv. Dr.Vinod Kumar Tewari, AOR Mr.Amit Kumar Srivastava, Adv. Mr.C.K.Sharma, Adv. Mr.Amit Wadhwa, Adv. Mr.Vikramaditya Singh, Adv. Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. Mrs.Vibha Dutta Makhija, Sr.Adv. Mr.Prashant Bhushan, AOR Mr.Prashant Shukla, Adv. Mr.Madhumaj Misra, Adv. Mr.Prashant Bhushan, Adv. Mr.Govind Jee, Adv. Mr.T.Sudhakar, Adv. Mr.C.A.Sundram, Sr.Adv. Mr.Keshav Ranjan, AOR Mr.C.A.Sundram, Sr.Adv. Mr.Rajendra Pd. Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, AOR Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar, Adv. Mr.Satyendra Kumar Srivastava, Adv. Ms.Sheenu Chauhan, Adv. Mr.Vinay Kumar, Adv. Mr.Yatinder Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, AOR Mr.Vinay Kumar, Adv.

	Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv.<br>Mr.Ashok Anand, Adv.<br>Mr.Somanatha Padhan, Adv.<br>Mr.Bipin Bihari Singh, Adv.
	Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, Sr.Adv.<br>Ms.Sonam Priya, Adv.<br>Mr.Sachin Bajpai, Adv.
	Mr.N.K.Mody, Sr.Adv.<br>Mr.Suman Kumar Divakar, AOR<br>Mr.Dipesh Dwivedi, Adv.<br>Mr.Sushil Kumar, Adv.
	Mr.Suman Kumar Divakar, Adv.<br>Ms.Chhaya Kumari, Adv.<br>Mr.Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Adv.<br>Mr.Pushkar Anand, Adv.
	Ms.Vijayalaxmi Jha, Adv.<br>Ms.Jasleen Kaur Sawhney, Adv.<br>Mr.Anil Kumar Jha, Adv.
(For Applicant)	Mr.Santosh Kr.Pandey, Adv.<br>Mr.Sandeep Jha, Adv.
(For Impleadment)	Mr.R.K.Singh, Adv.<br>Mrs.Neeraj Singh, Adv.<br>Mr.P.Dayal, Adv.<br>Mr.R.P.Goyal, Adv.
	Mr.Anand Nandan, Adv.<br>Mr.R.P.Goyal, Adv.
(For Impleadment)	Mr.Kumar Gaurav, Adv.<br>Mr.Robin Khokhar, Adv.<br>Mr.B.N.Dubey, Adv.<br>Ms.Swarupama Chaturvedi, Adv.
(For Intervention)	Mr.Santosh Kumar Tripathi, AOR<br>Mr.Chandan Tiwary, Adv.<br>Ms.Jyoti Kumari, Adv.<br>Ms.Jaya Kumari, Adv.
(For Impleadment)	Mr.Rajnish Kumar Jha, Adv.<br>Mr.Shrikant Dubey, Adv.<br>Mr.Mahendra Kumar, Adv.
	Mr.Manan Kr. Mishra, Sr.Adv.<br>Mr.Dinesh Kr. Tiwary, Adv.<br>Ms.Shama Sharma, Adv.

Ms.Rajmala Dohare, Adv. Mr.Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Adv. Mr.Rana Ranjit Singh, AOR Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr.Ravish Singh, Adv. Mr.Sanjay R. Hegde, Sr.Adv. Mr.Rahul Kumar, Adv. Mr.Avinash Mishra, Adv. Mr.Lokesh, Adv. Mr.Gaurav Yadava, Adv. Mr.Vijay Pratap Yadav, Adv. Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr.Karunakar Mahalik, AOR Mr.Durga Dutt, AOR Mr.Gaurav Yadava, Adv. Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr.Vijay Pratap Yadav, Adv. Mr.Rakesh Mishra, AOR Mr.Amit Pawan, AOR Mr.Jitendra Kumar, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Learned counsel appearing for all the respondents submits that they represent the cause of all the teachers who were before the High Court and who are beneficiaries of the impugned order. They also stated that they are not interested in filing any further counter or pleadings whether jointly or severally and whatever they have already filed is sufficient to dispose of these special leave petitions.

We record this statement and accordingly proceed on this basis that it is not necessary to serve any individual teacher of these proceedings.

All pending applications for intervention/impleadment are allowed.

Learned counsel appearing for the parties are at liberty to file one convenience volume to facilitate the hearing and this volume should be shared between all arguing counsel for their convenience.

Union of India/States are at liberty to file their respective affidavits.

Having regard to the issues involved and further keeping in view the large number of teachers who are affected by these proceedings, a request is made for early disposal of all these special leave petitions. We accept the prayer.

List the matters for final hearing on Tuesday, 31st July, 2018.

(Ashok Raj Singh) (Chander Bala) Court Master Court Master