The Commissioner Of Income Tax2 vs. Tech Mahindr Limited(Formerly Mahindra British Telecom Ltd) Director

BITEM NO.98 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 7853/2012 C.I.T BANGALORE & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S ADITI TECHNOLOGIES P.LTD. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH C.A. No. 8922/2013 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 4543/2014 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 7854/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8789/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8791/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8912/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8923/2013 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8924/2013 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 4293/2014 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 10830/2014 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8229/2015 (With Office Report) Date : 10/02/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Sudhakar Dwivedi, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Item No.98 -2- Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Sukumaran, Adv. Mr. Anand Sukumar, Adv. Ms. Meera Mathur,Adv. Ms. Prasanna Mohan, Adv. Ms. Y.P. Jha, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr. A. Lakshmi Narayanan, Adv. Mr. V. Balachandran,Adv. Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv. M/s. Karanjawala & Co.,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 7853, 8789 and 8791/2012 These matters are ready in all respect. C.A. No. 8922/2013 Appellant has filed the statement of case but the respondent has not filed the same. It is not mandatory after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. C.A. No. 4543/2014 and 7854/2012 Both the parties have not filed the statement of case. It is not mandatory after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. C.A. No. 8912/2012 Respondent has filed the statement of case but the appellant has not filed the same. It is not mandatory after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

Item No.98 -3- C.A. No. 8923 and 8924/2013 Service is complete but none has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent. Appellant has not filed the statement of case. It is not mandatory after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. C.A. No. 4293/2014 Service is complete but none has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent. Appellant has not filed the statement of case. It is not mandatory after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. C.A. No. 8229/2015 Both the parties have not filed the statement of case. It is not mandatory after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. All the above-said appeals be processed to be listed before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules, however, alongwith the connected appeal. C.A. No. 10830/2014 Last opportunity of two weeks is granted for filing application for amendment of cause title. List again on 5.4.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar