The Commissioner Of Income Tax2 vs. Tech Mahindr Limited(Formerly Mahindra British Telecom Ltd) Director
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.89 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IIIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL
Civil Appeal No(s). 7853/2012
C.I.T BANGALORE & ANR. Appellant(s)
VERSUS M/S ADITI TECHNOLOGIES P.LTD. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH C.A. No. 8922/2013 (With Office Report) Civil Appeal No(s). 7853/2012 C.A. No. 4543/2014 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 7854/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8789/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8791/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8912/2012 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8923/2013 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8924/2013 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 4293/2014 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 10830/2014 (With Office Report) C.A. No. 8229/2015 (With Office Report) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.12.15 17:36:59 IST Reason: Date : 15/12/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. Item No.89 -2- For Appellant(s) Ms. Rita Gupta, Adv. Ms. Bhaswati Anukampa, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Ms. Shruti Iyer, Adv.
Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. S. Sukumaran, Adv. Ms. Meera Mathur,Adv. Ms. Prasanna Mohan, Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma,Adv. Mr. V. Balachandran,Adv. Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv. M/s. Karanjawala & Co.,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. No.7853. 8789 and 8791/2012
Sole respondent in the above matters has been served and
is well represented.
Both the parties have filed the statement of case.
C.A. No. 4543/2014 and 7854/2012
Sole respondent in the above matters has been served and
is well represented.
Both the parties have not filed the statement of case.
C.A. No. 8912/2012
Sole respondent has been served and is well represented.
Appellant has not filed the statement of case but the
respondent has filed the same.
C.A. No. 4293/2014
Sole respondent has been served but none has entered appearance. Item No.89 -3-
Both the parties have not filed the statement of case. C.A. No. 10830/2014
The Ld. Counsel for the appellant to furnish the fresh address of the sole respondent. Notice be issued thereafter. C.A. No. 8229/2015
Both the respondents have been served and are represented.
Both the parties have not filed the statement of case.
C.A. No. 8922/2013
Sole respondent has been served and is represented.
Appellant has filed the statement of case but the respondent has not filed the same.
C.A. No. 8923 and 8924/2013
Service is complete on the sole respondent at SLP stage but none has entered appearance.
Both the parties have not filed the statement of case.
List all the matters for enabling the respective counsels
who will have to take steps and statement of case within two weeks.
List again on 10.2.2016.
(DR. K.ARUL) Registrar