Desh Ratna Foundation Th President Janar vs. Union Of India

d ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.10 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).421/2013 (From the judgement and order dated 12/09/2012 in CWP No.4599/2012 of the HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI) DESH RATNA FOUNDATION TH PRESIDENT JANARDAN Petitioner(s) PRASAD SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to place addl. documents on record and prayer for interim relief ) Date: 23/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR For Petitioner(s)1 Mr.Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr.Adv. Mr.S.K.Dubey, Adv. Mr.Sanket, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash,Adv. For Respondent(s)1 Mr.Sidharth Luthra, ASG Mrs.B.Sunita Rao, Adv. Ms.Supriya Juneja, Adv. Mr.Gurmohan Singh Bedi, Adv. For Ms. Sushma Suri ,Adv for Mr.B.V.Balram Das, Adv. R.No.3 Mr.Mukul Rohtagi, Sr.Adv. Ms.Joyti Singh, Sr.Adv. Ms.Jayasree Narasimhan, Adv. Mr. P. Narasimhan,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard Mr.Pattjoshi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.Sidharth Luthra, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for respondent no.1 and Mr.Mukul Rohtagi, learned senior counsel

: 2 : We see no reason to interfere with the findings rendered by the High Court, with respect to the eligibility of respondent no.3 for the concerned post. In view of the allegations which were made against respondent no.3, we had asked Mr.Luthra, learned Additional Solicitor General to get the relevant files from the Central Vigilance Commission for our perusal. He has produced the same. We have looked into the files and we do not see any reason to doubt the decision taken by the C.V.C. to clear the appointment of the respondent no.3.

The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

appearing for respondent no.3.

(G.V.Ramana) (Sneh Lata Sharma) Court Master Court Master