The State Of Bihar State Of Bihar And Anr. Chief Secretary vs. Khan Brothers Proprietor Namely Rustam Khan S/O Bana Khan

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.11 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 511/2004 INDORE CONSUMER FORUM (REGD.) & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 09/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Nanita Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ajay Narain Nath, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhijit Sengupta,Adv. Mr. Abhisth Kumar,Adv. Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. Mr. Anip Sachthey,Adv. Mr. Saakaar Sardana, Adv. Mr. Vikrant Yadav, adv. Mr. Archana Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhisth Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. Mr. Anil Shrivastav, Adv. Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adv. Mrs. K. E. Sema, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv. Mrs. Balaji Srinivasan, Adv. Digitally signed by Usha Rani Bhardwaj Date: 2014.12.10 16:14:37 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

Mr. K.K. Mahalik, Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. B. S. Banthia,Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Prema Singh, Adv. Mr. Suryanarayana Singh AAG, Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv. Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adv. Ms. Shubhra Rai, Adv. Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia,Adv. Mr. Khwairakpam Nobin Singh,Adv. Mr. M. T. George,Adv. Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,Adv. Mr. Radha Shyam Jena,Adv. Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Jha, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana,Adv. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee,Adv. Mr. Subhro Sanyal, Adv. Mr. R. Sathish,Adv. Mr. K.N. Madhusoodhanan, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde,Adv. Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra,Adv. Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma,Adv. Mr. V. G. Pragasam,Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta,Adv. M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.,Adv. M/s Corporate Law Group,Adv. Ms. G. Indira,Adv. Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Adv.

2

Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. Mr. Giss Antony, Adv. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv. Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh, Adv. M/s. Parekh & Co.,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

In this matter Respondent no. 40 is said to have not been served.

The Petitioners are allowed to get the notice served on Respondent No. 40 by Publication in the Daily Newspapers having wide circulation in Sonepat, Haryana.

Petitioners may file proof of service of publication within a period of four weeks.

(NEELAM GULATI) (SAROJ SAINI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

3