Ambit Realty vs. Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Private Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Surya Kant, Hon'ble Ujjal Bhuyan
Stage:
FRESHLY / ADJOURNED MATTERS
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
25 Nov 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
219988/2024,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).22371/2024
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-08-2024 in WP No.1360/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay]
M/S. AMBIT REALTY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
BYRAMJEE JEEJEEBHOY PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No.219988/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
Date : 25-11-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, AOR<br>Mr. Arun Panickar, Adv.<br>Ms. Prerna Priyadarshini, Adv.<br>Mr. Gaurav Adusumalli, Adv.<br>Mr. Vinay Nair, Adv.<br>Mr. Syed Faraz Alam, Adv.<br>Mr. Atharva Gaur, Adv.<br>Mr. Aayushman Aggarwal, Adv.<br>Mr. Manan Daga, Adv.<br>Mr. Shaurya Gupta, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Dr. Milind Sathe, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, AOR<br>Mr. Amogh Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Bhavin Bhatia, Adv.<br>Mr. Rohit Yadav, Adv.<br>Mr. Nirav Karia, Adv.<br>Ms. Shubhangi Pandey, Adv. |
| Mr. Anil C. Singh, Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Parul Shukla, Adv.<br>Mr. Aadarsh Vyas, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Senior counsel, who appears on caveat, on behalf of the respondents and carefully perused the material placed on record.
2. In view of the fact that the orders passed by the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee were totally atrocious and arbitrary, the High Court has rightly intervened and set aside the same vide the impugned order dated 26.08.2024.
3. In view of the above, no ground to interfere with the order dated 26.08.2024, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, is made out except to clarify that the issues pending consideration before this Court in SLP(C)No.19774/2018 etc. are distinguishable and have no direct bearing on the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case.
4. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
5. As a result, the pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR