The State Of Uttarakhand vs. Dinesh Kumar Chandola

ITEM NO.37

COURT NO.3

SECTION X

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ....................................

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-02-2023 in WPPIL No.48/2022 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital]

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

GURUDEV SINGH

Respondent(s)

([MS. MAHERAVISH REIN, ADVOCATE - A.C.] IA No.217279/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No.217281/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No.217280/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) WITH Diary No(s). 42084/2023 (X) $(IA)$ FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 221894/2023 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 221896/2023 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 221898/2023 IA No. 221894/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 221898/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 221896/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date: 09-12-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjeev Uniyal, A.A.G. Mr. Akshat Kumar, AOR Mr. Dhawal Unival, Adv. Ms. Anubha Dhulia, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saurabh Mishra, AOR Mr. Shrimay Mishra, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Pandey, Adv.

Mr. Rakesh Chander, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. On the oral prayer made by learned Additional Advocate General for the petitioners, he is permitted to file an amended memo of parties in which the petitioners as well as the respondent(s) may be added or deleted. Thereafter, it will be the responsibility of the petitioners to serve the newly-added respondents through dasti notice and through registered post for the date fixed.

2. Post these matters for hearing on 28.01.2025.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR