Eid Parry (India) Ltd vs. The State Of Karnataka& Ors.
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:27 Nov 2015
CNR:SCIN010419562015
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
6 | 1 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEM NO.28 | COURT NO.1 | SECTION IVA | |||||||
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A | ||||||||
Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C)CC Nos.20655-20657/2015 | |||||||||
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/02/2015<br>in WA No.3143/2014, WA No. 3144/2014 and WA No. 3145/2014 passed<br>by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore) | |||||||||
M/S. MANALI SUGARS LTD. | Petitioner(s) | ||||||||
VERSUS | |||||||||
GOVT. OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. | Respondent(s) | ||||||||
(with appln. (s) for permission to file SLP and office report) | |||||||||
Date : 27/11/2015 | These petitions were called<br>on for hearing today. | ||||||||
CORAM : | HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY | ||||||||
For Petitioner(s) | Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Ms.<br>Ms.<br>Mr. | Balaji Srinivasan,Adv.<br>H.N. Shashidhara, Adv.<br>Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Adv.<br>Srishti Govil, Adv.<br>Mayank Kshirsagar, Adv. | |||||||
For Respondent(s) | |||||||||
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | |||||||||
Permission to file special leave petitions | |||||||||
is granted. | |||||||||
Delay condoned. | |||||||||
Signature Not Verified | Notice. | ||||||||
Digitally signed by<br>Charanjeet Kaur<br>Date: 2015.11.28<br>12:51:50 IST<br>Reason: | Tag with S.L.P.(C) No.21241 of 2015. | ||||||||
In the meanwhile, no coercive steps shall be | |||||||||
2 | taken | against | the | petitioner, | which | shall | be | ||
subject to the condition that in the event these | |||||||||
special leave petitions fail, the respondent-State | |||||||||
shall be entitled to recover from the petitioner |
the amount together with interest at the rate of
9% per annum.
(Neetu Khajuria) (Vinod Kulvi) Sr.P.A. Assistant Registrar
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search
Same Parties
Eid Parry (India) Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka& Ors.Eid Parry (India) LtdThe State Of Karnataka& Ors.The South Indian Sugar Mills Association (Karnataka)N. S. L. Sugars Ltd. Represented By Its Authorized Signatory, Shri V MuniyappanCoromandal Sugars Ltd. Represented By Vice President Sri C. Pavan KumarThe Sugarcane Control Board Rep. By Its Member Secretary, Commissioner For Cane Development And Director Of SugarThe Gungabhadra Sugarcane And Babnana Growers Represented By Tis PresidentSri A. Narayana SinghSri A SiddeshwaraSri C. H. Srinivasa RaoSri S ShoaibRamappa Shettappa RabakaniSri Ravindra Shanker MirgeAnil Vittal PatilNational Farmers Organization Represent By Its President B. P. SheriSri SubhashSidagoudaP. GuruswamyAc Ravikuamr @ Anekere Ravi
Search in District Courts Data
Eid Parry (India) LtdThe State Of Karnataka& Ors.The South Indian Sugar Mills Association (Karnataka)N. S. L. Sugars Ltd. Represented By Its Authorized Signatory, Shri V MuniyappanCoromandal Sugars Ltd. Represented By Vice President Sri C. Pavan KumarThe Sugarcane Control Board Rep. By Its Member Secretary, Commissioner For Cane Development And Director Of SugarThe Gungabhadra Sugarcane And Babnana Growers Represented By Tis PresidentSri A. Narayana SinghSri A SiddeshwaraSri C. H. Srinivasa RaoSri S ShoaibRamappa Shettappa RabakaniSri Ravindra Shanker MirgeAnil Vittal PatilNational Farmers Organization Represent By Its President B. P. SheriSri SubhashSidagoudaP. GuruswamyAc Ravikuamr @ Anekere RaviAdvocate Balaji SrinivasanAdvocate Anitha Shenoy