Madhurakavi Nandavanam vs. The Idol Of Sriranganathaswamy

COURT NO.4

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).1612-1616/2024 K. RAJAGOPALAN Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE IDOL OF SRIRANGANATHASWAMY & ORS. Respondent $(s)$

(IA No.176649/2024 - ADDITION/DELETION/MODIFICATION PARTIES) Date: 15-10-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN CORAM :

[IN CHAMBER]

For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pritha Srikumar Iyer, AOR Mr. Arun Sri Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhyudaya Shishodia, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

There are five special leave petitions i.e., SLP(C) Nos.1612, 1613, 1614, 1615 and 1616 of 2024. Petitioner wants deletion of the names of certain proforma respondents in each of the special leave petitions in the following manner:

Respondents nos.2 to 46 in SLP(C) No.1612 of 2024, respondent nos.2 to 35 in SLP(C) No.1613 of 2024, respondent nos.2 to 23 in SLP(C) No.1614 of 2024, respondent nos.2 to 43 in SLP(C) No.1615 of 2024 and respondent nos.2 to 32 in $SLP(C)$ No.1616 of 2024.

$\overline{2}$ . petitioner filed only However, has $one$ <pre>interlocutory</pre> application being I.A. No.176649/2024 for deleting the names of all ^y above parties in the five different special leave petitions.

$3.$ Be that as it may, interlocutory application is allowed and

$\mathbf{1}$

the names of the above respondents be struck off from the array of parties in the respective special leave petitions at the risk of the petitoiner. Cause title be amended accordingly.

(ARJUN BISHT) (PREETHI T.C.) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR