Ramulu vs. State Of A. P. , Rep. By Its Prl. Secretary, Revenue Department , Hyd.

ITEM NO.6,7 & 8 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIIA

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDGS

Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 18712-18728/2014

(Arisg out of impugned fal judgment and order dated 29.04.2014 in WP No. 14583/2012, WP No. 14589/2012, WP No. 14590/2012, WP No. 14603/2012, WP No. 14582/2012, WP No. 14585/2012, WP No. 14591/2012, WP No. 14598/2012, WP No. 14894/2012, WP No. 14593/2012, WP No. 14835/2012, WP No. 14895`/2012, WP No. 14594/2012, WP No. 14602/2012, WP No. 14576/2012, WP No. 14595/2012, WP No. 14850/2012 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad)

G. SHASHIKANTH AND ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 29842-29846/2014

(With appln.(s) for impleadment as party respondent and permission to delete respondent from array of party and transposing respondents as petitioners, interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 3944/2015 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and deletion of proforma respondent and exemption from filing certified/ordinary copy of impugned order and impleadment and office report)

SLP(C) Nos. 34644-34646 of 2014

SLP(C) No. 13415 of 2015 (With appln.(s) for deletion of the name of respondent and exemption from filing lengthy list of dates)

Date : 01/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. Digitally signed by Charanjeet Kaur Signature Not Verified

CORAM : 17:27:31 IST Reason:

Date: 2015.09.01

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. T.V. Ratnam,Adv. Mr. Sankara Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Kylasanatha Pillay, Sr. Adv. Mr. A.V.S. Raju, Adv. Mr. CH.L. Sarveswar, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. A.V.S. Raju, Adv. Mr. V.K. Sidarthan, Adv. For Appellant(s)/ Mr. P.V. Krishnaiah, Adv. Respondent(s) Mr. R. Santhnan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Prera Singh, Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv. Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kr. Tyagi, Adv. for M/s Venkat Palwai Law Associates, Advs. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) Nos. 18712-18728 of 2014

Learned Judges of the High Court while disposing of the petitions, in the penultimate paragraph have observed that if for any reason, the petitioners have some grievance, they can make appropriate representation before the competent authority.

In our view, the aforesaid observation of the High Court would be more than sufficient for the petitioners to approach the authorities by bringing

2

to their notice their specific grievance. If such representation is made within one month, the authority will consider the same within two months thereafter in accordance with law and in accordance with the various circulars/notifications issued from time to time.

The special leave petitions are disposed of accordingly.

As a natural corollary of the order passed above, all pending applications, if any, are disposed of.

SLP(C) Nos. 29842-29846/2014, 3944/2015, 34644-34646 of 2014, 13416 of 2015

Delay condoned, if any. Dismissed.

[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar